Your car has broken down, so you want to cross the freeway by foot to seek for help. Almost instantly, you become aware of the fact that crossing will bear a considerable risk. Trying to assess the success of your unintentional adventure, you see that it all depends on the number of cars driving past. Surely you will think twice walking to the bridge nearby to cross the autobahn safely.
This example clearly shows that even if the situation does not change (i.e. even if the number of cars on the freeway remains unchanged), you can find a way to cross without risk.
We have to proceed in the same way in the case of nanomaterials, or in the case of carbon nanotubes (CNT) that are discussed hereunder.
Risk assessment must be preceded by identification of the potential hazards without which, indeed, risks would not exist at all (compare the example given above: cars may be dangerous). In addition, it is necessary to determine whether the environment or humans are exposed to CNT (compare our example: cars actually drive on the autobahn; if there are none, we don’t care how dangerous they are). Humans currently are not concerned. Since they may well become affected as the quantity of CNT produced increases, precautionary measures must be taken that anticipate or even presuppose exposure and promote the necessary studies in advance.
Eventually, all risk assessment must be based on information on the production quantities, the products, uses and disposal of carbon nanotubes as well as on the knowledge of their biological effects and environmental
exposure
. The effect depends on the dose occurring and remaining in the respective environment or organism.
Some hundred tons of carbon nanotubes are presently produced each year. Since quantities are expected to soon amount to many thousand tons, it makes sense to take a closer look at further aspects. Most of the CNT-containing products are composite materials, i.e compounds with plastics integrated in a matrix. This is important as regards the biological effects: Since, probably, there is no direct contact, the CNT will not be taken up into the body. Disposal issues, therefore, seem to be more relevant. Since CNT are modified carbons whose combustion in the presence of air leaves no other residues than water and CO2, no problems are expected to occur. It is essential instead to identify the products that contain “free CNT” or that are applied directly to the body or in the body. The effects of increased uptake that can be expected must be tested in in vitro and in vivo tests or within toxicological studies. While much is known today on the biology of CNT, the effects of an increased uptake are analyzed world-wide at present. Reliable results will be available within some years.
A first appraisal based on existing knowledge is made regarding the two major findings of tests on animals and humans:
- The particularly long carbon nanotubes (>> 30 mm), other than the short ones, cause disadvantageous biological effects in animals [1, 3, 6].
- In addition, a strong biological effect is observed to be caused by CNT containing metal residues left over from production [2, 4, 5 ].
Since only short carbon nanotubes are produced today, the risk assessed is low. An increased risk is expected from future longer variants made up of stiffer bundles.
Literature:
-
Belyanskaya, L et al 2009, Neurotoxicology 30, 702-711
-
Kagan, VE et al 2006, Toxicol. Lett. 165, 88-100.
-
Poland, CA et al 2008, Nature Nanotech. 3, 423-428.
-
Pulskamp, K et al 2007,
Toxicol. Lett. 168, 58-74.
-
Shvedova, AA et al 2009, Pharmacology & Therapeutics Vol121 (2),192-204
-
Wick, P et al 2007, Toxicol. Lett. 168, 121-131.